By Michael McDonald. Oilprice.com
BP CEO Bob Dudley recently came out making an interesting point regarding the silver lining from the fall in oil prices.
Dudley notes that as a result of low oil prices, subsidies have been cut on many petroleum products around the world. This is important in that it creates a more even playing field and a freer market internationally for many oil products.
There are more than 800 fossil fuel subsidies around the world, and these subsidies distort markets, often in favor of inefficient local producers. These subsidies are costly for governments and often for the people the subsidies are actually intended to help.
Even within the country that often complains most loudly about restrictions on international trade, America, there is a hidden subsidy in the form of the export ban which helps certain domestic industries at the cost of other domestic industries.
In particular, of the $500 billion annually that the IMF says subsidies cost, about half is spent by countries in the Middle East and North Africa. These subsidies are primarily to suppress local fuel costs and help ensure a happy populace.
As oil prices have swooned, many oil exporting countries have seen a huge hole blown in their budgets which those countries have struggled to close as much as possible, any way they can. That has put a big target on fuel subsidies.
Even outside the Middle East though, Dudley cited India and Indonesia as examples of where fuel subsidies are being slashed. These are huge countries and to the extent that oil markets become less subsidized, it should help create a more balanced and fluid oil market where prices are dictated by supply and demand rather than government fiat.
That helps oil producers broadly and even indirectly helps domestic U.S. producers (who still cannot export crude for the most part).
Even mighty Saudi Arabia is considering following the UAE’s lead and starting to cut subsidies, though reports on the move also indicate that the country will likely be cautious and ramp up subsidies on food and other goods to help avoid inflation surprises as a result of any subsidy cuts and the ensuing price increases.
The UAE’s decision to cut oil subsidies is evidence for just how big a distortion these decisions can have. Manufacturing and industry in general across the UAE have benefited from the low cost of gasoline there which runs $0.50 a liter versus roughly $0.84 a liter in the U.S.
Those subsidies cost the UAE $29 billion annually or about $3,200 per person in the country. Saudi Arabian subsidies run to nearly $107 billion annually while Qatar’s subsidies are valued at close to $6,000 per person.
These subsidies encourage excess consumption of fuel in the UAE and elsewhere and distort the local economy. To some extent, fuel in the UAE should be cheaper than elsewhere simply given the logistics of moving it and the proximity of oil in the area.
But subsidies in excess of those cost efficiencies create artificial incentives to consume more oil than needed and contribute to less economically efficient industries. As the UAE and other countries slowly move away from those subsidies, local industries will learn to be more economically efficient and, in the long run, the country will have a stronger economy as a result.
The same principle holds across the globe. And that’s indeed a silver lining in the oil price collapse.
By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com
First Published by Oilprice.comTags: Fuel subsidies in Africa International oil market Intgernational oil prices oil and gas news Uganda Oil and gas Uganda Uganda oil news